Popular Posts

Wednesday, June 13, 2018

Coca-Cola , McDonald’s , Ford , Rahul Gandhi and the Hidden Question

Coca-Cola , McDonald’s , Ford , Rahul Gandhi and the Hidden Question


Coca-Cola history is in limelight in India after Shri Rahul Gandhi –  President of All India Congress Committee made a Statement about its origin during OBC Conference few days back. Following are some points with its point of view in which it was used.
1. Coca cola company owner started and grown to today’s success from as scratch as  selling Shikanji.
2. In India no one did this kind of growth based on their skills in their area of expertise.
Its obvious that ruling party will blow this statement through its literal meaning. If we give RaGa benefit of doubt that he meant was selling cold drinks on streets of some American town/City/ Village , as Shikanji is sold on streets of North Indian towns and cities. It’s still a false statement. As Coca-Cola was invented by a Pharmacist as a Patented medicine. It was commercialised through another businessmen by buying it’s patent and selling it through aggressive marketing who was manufacturer of patented medicine.
If we go and find history of McDonalds and ford ,it seems all examples by RaGa will not stand on ground of historical facts. But the message what he was trying to deliver has to be taken seriously.
The message is In India we don’t have successfull first generation businessmen , who has started from grass root and achieved the pinnacle in their area of expertise e.g. ford did in automobile. Is it a real issue? Believe it or not but looking at larger picture it seems that it is a truth. But the question arise here is it the fact? If yes why so? And if not why it seems to be like it?
India is a land of people with talent who doesn’t have platform to showcase it. Reason is the old and infamous reason given  we are 1.25 billion..... If you know how to bowl the probability to bowl for your country lies at below 0.00000125%.  The issue is same in every industry be it service, manufacturing or for that matter farming. Most of our youth is behind securing future through secured employment in this sequence Central Govt. Job > State Govt. Job> Govt. Owned Company Job> Giant business house Job ... The entrepreneurship as a field of work is option to only those who has somewhat secured future through parental business/ Property. This is not 100% true in all Cases but it’s mostly the case. So we are killing probability to have first generation tycoon unless they are gifted with some special ability which cannot be cultivated in a human through training/ education.
Just for example
1. Would we allow our university student to create a platform that connects people and which is free to use. And he/ she want to pursue it as a career path. Answer honestly. That’s why we don’t have Zuckerberg.
2. Would we allow our child to get excused from math class and work on his/her interest on computers( think about the time period of late 60s and early 70s). Would we support our child who found a bug in programme and get free extra time for using computer  and get caught and banned. If your answer is no. Then that no is the reason why we don’t have Bill Gates.

This is a social reason which is practical and nothing is wrong about it as a middle-class family in India was never provided the confidence to risk their earnings to think and work out of the box. That takes us to reason two and that’s political. Till 90s we were closed economy. No one was required to be entrepreneur was the motto of the government. What to produce/ how much to produce/ where to produce/ for how much it should be sold was decided and controlled by authorities. Practically speaking we wanted someone to use his own money and work for government. In doing so we missed that bus. However we caught next bus and we are seeing fabulous growth of enterprises across country generally through second or third generation business families. In last few years we have seen some first generation entrepreneur also but it will take time till we see them as tycoons.
Even after all this odds  I personally don’t believe that we didn’t created first generation tycoons as we have many who sailed against this odds and created a fortune. To name a few Karsanbhai Patel of NIRMA, Dhirubhai Ambani of Reliance and Baba Ramdev/ Acharya Balakrishna of Patanjali.
Now the question is why can’t we see this success? The short answer is we love to empathize a poor for his poverty but if he breaks through that bane and become rich we start doubting the way he achieved that success. A last monologue by Abhishek Bachchan in movie Guru answers this very well.
May God protect our country from this shallow and complex driven mentality.
Jai Hind.


Tuesday, January 30, 2018

Padmavaat - History - Rajput Pride.

After a much havoc padmavaat was released worldwide last week.  The movie starts with a disclaimer that it's is based on Malik MuhhamaM Jayasi's tell known as Padmavaat. Rajput karni Sena kept on opposing the release even after supreme Court verdict against them and few states. The reason is the movie is against Rajput Pride.

After watching the movie first thought came to my mind that the agitation should be done by Malik Muhammad Jayasi's current descendants as in order to keep Rajput Pride intact Sanjay Leela bhansali changed the basic facts of the novel.

Following are few points.

1.  Jayasi's starts with Ratan Sen's ( not Singh) obsession for Padmini Princess of Sinhala.

2. It was Ratan Sen who with consultation with Padmini decided to show padmini's face to khilji even after strong opposition from Senapati Hora Singh. Who left chittor and returned after Ratan Sen's arrest and Padmini's request.

3.  Ratan Sen was kidnapped from the door of Chittorgarh and not from khilji camp. It was disastours that Chittor army couldn't protect their own king at the door of their own Fort.

4. Senapati Gora Singh died in battel to rescue Ratan Sen and Badal rescued Ratan Sen to Chittor.

5. Most critical part is When Ratan Sen was kidnapped king of Kumbhalner 'Devpal' (Rajput) proposed padminini for marriage. After rescue from khilji Ratan Sen fought one on one with Devpal and both died.

6. There was no Ratan Sen to protect Chittor and Padmini from khilji as he died fighting with another Rajput.

Looking at this if Bhansali had made movie exactly as narrated in Jayasi's poem it could have a real insult and mirror showing event to Rajputs that their internal fights provided red carpet welcome to mamluks , khilji, tuglaq and mughals.

No Invading army could have won against Native Indian forces if they were united namely
Marwad , Mewar and Amer.

I think karni Sena leaders has never visited kumbhal Garh fort as Maharana Kumbhakarna ( popularly known as Maharana Kumbha) inscription at fort writes as below

That ruler [Samarasiṃha] with all his sins removed by the worship of Maheśa became the lord of svarga, after entrusting the defence of Mount Chitrakuta to his son Ratnasiṃha. When he [Ratnasiṃha] had departed, Lakṣmasiṃha of the family of Khummana defended that excellent fort, (for) even though the established traditions of the family be forsaken by cowards, those who are valorous and steady do not give up their pursuit. Having thus destroyed his enemies in battle, he [Lakṣmasiṃha] died purified by weapons while defending Chitrakuta.
Kumbhalgarh inscription of Kumbhakarna

Ref ( Rajendra Singh Kushwaha (2003). Glimpses of Bhāratiya history. Ocean. ISBN 978-81-88322-40-4.)

A more disturbing fact Maharana Kumbhakarna belong to same dynasty of suryavanshi Rajput. The only difference is Ratan Singh is from Rawal clan and Kumbha Karna ins from Rana Clan.

Their own thoughts for Ratan Singh are more insulting than the movie of Bhansali.

In next post I will narrate three Rajput king's who fought with khilji. I wish you will decide who was full of valour and who was least.

The three kings and their story and literature on them in  popular culture is listed below.

1. Hammir Singh of Ranthambhore in text by Amir Khusrow
2. Ratan Sen of chitrakoot( Chittor) in Malik Muhammad jayasi  and  Hem ratan
3. Karn Singh Vaghela - popular Gujarati novel Karan Ghelo  by Nand Shankar Mehta.



Thursday, January 25, 2018

Pride , Padmavaat and Pseudo Valor

Padmavaat - A movie based on Malik Mohammad Jayasi's Book on  Maharani Padmini aka Padmavati is in controversy. Whatever arguments are being put forward the base of all arguments is on insulting Rajput Valor and woman Dignity. All Rajput leaders irrespective of the state they hail from are united on the issue. They are forgetting fundamental historic fact that their divisiveness laid red carpet to all invaders right from the time of porus through Prithviraj Chauhan till Maharana Pratap.

A quick Questions....

1. What was about woman Dignity when Mirabai was thrown out based on his religious practices (in same fort Maharani Padmini commited Jauhar)

2. Why Maharani Karnavati need to write letter of help to Second Mughal Humayun in Agra ( (1000 KMs)instead of Rathores of marwad( 300 KMs).

3. Why Maharana Pratap left alone politically to help Rani Durgavati?

4. What happened to your valour (which is being showcased on School buses and public transport vehicles) when Ghazni ransacked somnath.

5 Wasn't Prithviraj Rajput , who was left alone to fight Ghori?

I bow down to Glory of Rajput ladies who committed Jouhar to save their Respect. I bow down to Prithviraj Chauhan, Bappa Rawal, Maharana Pratap ( and countless others)for their real Valor.

Whatever happening today in our nation is showcasing pseudo Valor.  All this acts are basically resulting in maligning "Rajputi Shaan".

Lord Krishna says
                        karmendriyani samyamya
ya aste manasa smaran
indriyarthan vimudhatma
mithyacarah sa ucyate

SYNONYMS

karma-indriyani—the five working sense organs; samyamya—controlling; yah—anyone who; aste—remains; manasa—by mind; smaran—thinking; indriya-arthan—sense objects; vimudha—foolish; atma—soul; mithya-acarah—pretender; sah—he; ucyate—is called.

TRANSLATION

One who restrains the senses and organs of action, but whose mind dwells on sense objects, certainly deludes himself and is called a pretender.